Merely on the ground that in Form GSTR-2A thesaid tax is not reflected should not be a sufficient ground to deny the assessee the claim of the input tax credit.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 21ST BHADRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 29769 OF 2023

It was held in the case of DIYA AGENCIES vs THE STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE G.S.T DEPARTMENT

In view thereof, I find that the impugned Exhibit P-1 assessment order so far denial of the input tax credit to the petitioner is not sustainable, and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer to give opportunity to the petitioner for his claim for input tax credit. If on examination of the evidence submitted by the petitioner, the assessing officer is satisfied that the claim is bonafide and genuine, the petitioner should be given input tax credit. Merely on the ground that in Form GSTR-2A the said tax is not reflected should not be a sufficient ground to deny the assessee the claim of the input tax credit. The assessing authority is therefore, directed to give an opportunity to the petitioner to give evidence in respect of his claim for input tax credit. The petitioner is directed to appear before the assessing authority within fifteen days with all evidence in his possession to prove his claim for higher claim of input tax credit. After examination of the evidence placed by the petitioner/assessee, the assessing authority will pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*